A Risk Hierarchy

In my experience, most investors’ risk hierarchy looks something like the following.

In a less highly imperfect world, I would prefer to see #2 rank above #1, but our risk aversions are just too high for that to happen very often.  Most often, #3 comes into play in very good times — when fear has disappeared and when greed and ego are in charge.  Finally, #4 typically only matters to the professionals and, even then, largely because it’s elegant and makes the math work out better.

It is fascinating, therefore, that for many in this business risk is actually presumed to be volatility.  Of course, even then, it only tends to apply when issues are being dealt with conceptually or when it’s self-serving to do so.  When a portfolio is tanking, even the most rational of traders is very concerned with #1 and #2.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s